Click Infinte Love Loves YOU Regardless Of Belief System
As long as we frenetically and often even fatalistically use a Bible, Pastor, Priest, Concordance, wordy concepts or Popes to convince us that we have been justified by faith (which is true as merely conceptual), faith will remain nothing more than a bumper sticker we’ll keep rather than an experience we’ll know. Neither bumper stickers nor self-righteously myopic maxims reveal truths that will lead to any modicum of freedom. Any universally self-evident truth cannot require its acceptance by threatening an eternally tormenting conclusion by way of belief without experientially knowing truth’s infinitely stable patience. An eternally tormenting conclusion would be counterintuitive to even a marginally loving mother of a litter of baby kittens. Think about the biblically crude and culturally corybantic term “long-suffering.” Instead of using infinite love, they used long-suffering. No one to blame, that’s just where the evolution of consciousness was in Old days and even within the New Testament day — not that the same old lies aren’t being even further divided during these present days. But can we imagine an Infinite Love capable of submitting to Satan just to cull such an insoluble double bind blockade? That wouldn’t be a bind but an insufferable guilt trip with nihilism as its non-existent destination. Are we willing to face it (whatever it is)? Dualistic Christianity is a long-winded way to keep clergy on a payroll — not all but seemingly most. To be sure, there are exceptions and generally they have been martyred or called heretics. The God we were handed was more like Hitler than Mother Teresa! And when we labeled the Cosmic Christ consciousness within us ALL as merely religious window-dressed Christianity, understanding anything other than a tribal Jesus bound as a detainee inside a bible made peace and goodwill plain old parochialism! Wrath, not universal restoration, became burdensome theologically thuggish rhetoric. Did Zeus send Jesus to protect humanity from His anticipatory wrathful violence and unhinged vitriol? Was Jesus not only God’s only Son but His plan B? If so, the stakes were too high and every inadvertent blunder on our part stoked the fires of our unavoidably interminable punishment — no parole board or pardon was possible. What to do, or rather be or even say?
“I did my best! I swear I did!” -Humanity
Here and now, Imagine, and we all know deep down that we all can and do know, an infinite love that isn’t external to ourselves — our infinite souls — replying with something very close to what follows:
“Okay, let me start by telling you what you have been programmed to hear from every one and every book but who I am — Infinite Love and your best friend. Even a swarming fly in a room with a lonely soul becomes this soul’s best friend. If you can’t believed that, then imagine that. So, here I go and I’ll begin by not coming on too loving as this might scare the fervently religious devotee among you as well as the fervently religious atheist among you. How would I, as infinite love, frighten your labels of you who are not, in truth you will know and then you’ll awaken to unlearn this genus and species fiasco. I love you, not your label or title. So, let me give you a few seconds of frght night and we’ll move on from there if that’s okay:
Your best is bogus and swearing even accidentally adds greater bucolic contempt to My infinite crematorium! Had I created you to learn by trial and error, I would be the God of grace you inerrant Bible thumpers deconstructed and did so in your self-seeking and self-interested own image. But understand that I became the image of the God you were too fearful to question because you were determined to make money and earn grace and in so doing — miss the point! Would I, as a God kept free from the privatization of denominational religion truly have been infinitely free? If so, would my being infinitely free have threatened your finitely financial freedoms? There is nothing that glosses over habituated and hatefully divided countries like finding yet another common external enemy? And since we’re being honest, do you really think an infinite love isn’t infinitely inclusive love? Do you really think I am an externally indifferent tyrant towards all other people in those other counties who have been blessed not to have yet been programmed by three colored flags promising patriotic comforts? Don’t think I hate anyone but neither continue to hold the illusion that infinite love has ever befriended demagogues who drop my name as though I too can be another objectified label. As if Infinite love is a namable noun instead of a loving verb of illuminating light quite capable of using love and not labels to deconstruct hardly divine institutionalized guilt! Would infinite love threaten the universe much less the earth’s inhabitants with unremitting brimstone as My only unoriginally if not embarrassingly uncreative finite placement! Infinite love makes finite conclusions? Where’d you read and from terror believe that? Was it my overbearing countenance or your theologian’s overbearing countenance that has caused you to pursue the mule headed notion that infinite love expects perfection which as surely you know is passive-aggression waiting to happen to another generation? I am not Zeus, that’s in your head and that’s why you are currently behaving heartlessly! But behavior modification is big business and you should already know very short-lived. Just like fear. Know divine law will never be Trumped by human law! If you know nothing else, know this here and now! If you were programmed a fundamental Catholic or a fundamental Protestant, you were very likely parentally pushed down the aisle-way of their fearful opinions of what they thought I was — not who I am. Be honest and you’ll likely see infinite love as a historical action figure and not a very kindly loving one at that. Perhaps Zeus or something worse still - the Zeus who actually submitted to Satan’s final and finite loveless conclusions. But, so you’ll begin to know and not just believe, I am non-existent if you still think I have anything to do with wrath, hell or eternal damnation. Why? Because you were trained to miss subtly by paid clergy who taught you what to look for but never how to see. Here’s how you were hoodwinked. In an angst-wrought panic from pre-crastination (believe anything just to hurry up and get life over with) you jumped through conditionally loveless hoops with the unlikely hopes that you’d get into heaven. You made a silly public confession of faith (if you’re a Protestant) but failed to slow down long enough to see what your first confessed sin would be? The verse in Hebrews says that it is impossible to please God without faith? Did it ever occur to you that it’s impossible to do anything sincerely loving when you’ve been programmed by insincere guilty pleas worded to be confessions of faith? The clueless clergyman set you up for punishment from the outset! A confession is a statement – made by a person acknowledging some personal fact that the person would ostensibly prefer to keep hidden. The term presumes that the speaker is providing information that he or she believes the other party (me, Infinite Love is not already aware of, and is frequently associated with an admission of a moral and legal wrong: In one sense it is the acknowledgment of having done something wrong, whether on purpose or not.”
Such a message isn’t hard to clue into regardless of our lack of theological illogicality. In reality, it’s better for those of us who didn’t enroll in theology which by definition is, “The study of God’s nature and religious belief.” Say What?
So, this was the diabolical move by bucolic Protestantism. How’d they get away with it? The 18 50 sudden onset decision by southern Protestants in the United States who incredulously deemed the Bible inerrant. I wonder if they ever wondered how all people got along without an inerrant bible for centuries and moreover, for what obvious reasons Western Christianity has since split into over 44 thousand denominations following the reformation? Some of you bit the bait and believed the bible was a caselaw book to banish those with differing Christian beliefs systems? This isn’t the love of Christ — much less a religion that could possibly grow from a lovingly inclusive and universal love from infinite love. Instead, it became a dog and pony production that preached an approach/avoidance but of propaganda. Furthermore, it remained largely and fearfully dependent on demanding old time religion as being good enough in spite of Jesus’s saying that people will reject the new and say, “Oh well, old shopworn religion is good enough, I reckon.”
Nonetheless, it is still a highly deceptive and confusing promotional advertisement that pretended to promise that if we paid tithes to support the same sermons 52 Sundays a year, that we’d possibly be eligible for the evacuation plan. This is silly and nothing but a lotto-pick whereby all tickets have been sold without the benefit of including any numbers. A Lose/lose fiasco. Anyway, It would seem our first unwittingly ignorant confession of moral depravity was not only forcibly made to be a public confession, but demanded eternal damnation insofar as we openly confessed that our first major folly was our faith — but before we were told that without faith we could never please god! Could we have appealed to a higher source? Sure, but we were actually told that Infinte love didn’t exist for us until we believed IN God — and we weren’t sure if this noun was infinite or eternal. Experiences we had as a children were largely forgotten after that scare tactic. I don’t blame you because you didn’t know! You really didn’t!”
And yet it seems our suffering many mistakes by way of His wrath makes Him suffer even greater rage for an even longer period of time but if God is infinite, why force hell’s furnace on us at gunpoint? “No hurry, no worry,” as my Puerto Rican amiga used to tell me! I agree with her because it works experientially. But divine dualism sounds like a strangely stressful Standard Operating Procedure for Infinitely Patient Love that IS our soul’s timeless Potentiality. Oxymoronic — much like the absurd idea of Infinite Love’s Being, well, being compelled to make a finite conclusion with hell as an impossibly redemptive and restorative option.
“One strike and you were out before conception!”
It just doesn’t work. It really doesn’t!
This atonement theory was at least a theory. Tertullian of Roman Carthage and Martin Luther — respectively — coined hell and openly encouraged cruelty to both Jews and peasants! Infinite Patience IS Love and has never been a theologian’s client to perform a highly limited and crude personality assessment on. This is absurd! Defending fear is the trance-self’s last futile effort towards attempting to deny unconditional love is also infinitely true.
If we got everything we wanted, we'd get scarcely anything we would truly need. What about oxygen? Oxygen not only goes without saying but because it is oxygen whether we study it or not, we live without mentioning the word. To be sure, we can go on living only because of oxygen and in spite of our rarely considering it as absolutely necessary. However, there are exceptions given how much time elapses before oxygen enters the human organism again for the human organism to not only live but experience consciousness while clinically dead. I am speaking of near death experiences and most importantly, my near death experience. But note that you can experience this so-called other side within this eternal now. There is nothing to believe but only practice. It is absurd to deny oxygen isn’t a provisional agent provided by an Infinite Source regardless of whether or not a fervently religious and a furtively rationale being goes about explaining oxygen as a byproduct of this physiological process bent towards homeostasis. And to think that one has ever thought to explain oxygen as an object of discussion still demands this one’s requiring oxygen as they attempt to explain it. It’s like explaining an answer to a question absent any knowledge of what the question was or is.
Forestalling during an argument is a tactic. Forestalling after the question’s answer is abundantly clear is to unconsciously continue to create fearfully worrisome confusion inside what Christianity has generally referred to as, “the indwelling Spirit of Truth, Holy Spirit or just Inner Witness.” Rather than over spiritualize this soul-residing guiding inward Friend, I am going to reference this Spirit of Truth as my true self’s calm and highly perceptive intuition and my patient pointer. When our inner conclusions clash with reality, it creates suffering and that suffering is called friction. What is needed is timeless and spacial expansion. The eternal now.
The surest sign of a person who exists almost fully from his or her false self is a constant defending of his or her fears along with typically holding excessively rigid self-righteous opinions about all things conservative and dualistically parochial. Generally a person who is operating from the false self is very protective of his or her religious belief systems and, all things being the same, tend not to be very easy to live with. Hoarding things and excluding others who they perceive as unbelieving in the biblically myopic, highly impatient and early wounded Christian God. When asked if they would rather know and relate to an infinitely loving Creator or would prefer a Creator who would be more incessantly focused on infinite justice. All things being equal, these people will become significantly more furious over one’s suggesting hell doesn’t exist than they have ever become happily passionate about heaven’s possibly existence. They tend to be overly serious and almost entirely caught up in capitalistic materialism and reject any notion of God as infinitely loving, forgiving, caring, merciful or given to universally inclusivity of God’s very own creation. While I’m painting with a somewhat broad brush, fervently religious people enjoy dividing this label, Christianity, into schisms with dogmatically petty belief systems. Over 95 percent of fear-defending people will occasionally weigh in with a disingenuous window-dressing supporting God as partially capable of unconditional love but only if exclusion was acceptable by those who didn’t believe that love was also infinite. They delight in daydreaming about those who they don’t agree with on earth as surely being fit for a special place in hell. Such people are huge fans of all 15th through 18th century hymnody inasmuch as they feel that their hatred, violence and vengeance is shared with their mental image of the Canaanite killing God who still demands sacrifice over mercy even thought His son, Jesus, implored those he taught to go an learn why he desires mercy and not sacrifice.
Defending fear is nothing but self-banishment. Unworkable. And a belief isn’t even a label but an opinion and thus an aberration that is neither fiction nor fact because both are nonexistent. Try kissing or hugging a concept. If love is conditional, set the conditions? Infinite justice? That seems to be what language’s labels lord over infinite life that is incapable of being hoodwinked by finitely feckless vengeance. Perhaps silence is truth if not even freedom. For example, “She’ll never change.” Well, if she will never change, whoever is making such a stupidly finite claim will need what her consciousness is — if to ever begin to merge with this simplest mystery. What we are looking for is this Being who knows our being by way of our inseparable oneness within this One who’s looking. One knows oneself inside love and one knows love inside oneself.
We want justice swiftly and even inaccurately served until it’s our turn to beg mercy’s pardon. And it is justice that needs pardoning and mercy who has ended finite justice with infinite love. Who do we think rescored the Bible? Rather, not who but what mauled and edited the Bible into a win/lose lamentable and loveless cacophony replete with conceptual words that cannot convince a conscious being of infinite torment without the transforming of its finite unconsciousness into a conscious being that needs no convincing. Such low level consciousness would attempt to move towards everything but an inseparably Infinite consciousness within an ever-unfolding and ever expanding timeless space. Timelessness and ever-expanding space would thus be no less inconceivable as every word that is mere abstraction and never sheer answer. So, getting back to this infinitely loving and inseparable consciousness — BEING — imagine this unitive and infinite consciousness saying: “Because I am, you are.” A way to get some kind of idea of this is to Imagine a car oil funnel that has been inverted. The universe is expanding at the rate of two million miles per second. And even here, it wouldn’t matter whether the oil change was being done on a car that’s on its wheels or on its top. Every star is infinitely north and we will know it but have no need for knowledge as given because it’s seamlessly and presently received. Now, we remove “THE” truth which is a definite article and part of speech and “THE” truth becomes ONLY truth. Look at the word ‘de-finite’ and perceive it along side the word ‘in-definite.’ “De” connotes outside while “in” connotes within. For a being to a being, it must be within the ultimate being even if the appearance is that it is outside of the being. But there’s no such appearance once you awaken from trance. Imagine a snow globe that you shake. Even if you bust the globe, its contents remain inside the realm of reality in which you move and live. But imagine a snow globe that is ever-expanding at around two million miles per second and it isn’t hard to perceive how whatsoever the contents or energy forms are that are released, these energy forms enjoy timeless and spacial expansion.
What is this being? It seems that it would certainly not be as Western religionists have thought — a being separate from an-other being that would necessarily be contingent upon its being-ness to be and thus, the Being is itself inseparably aware that because Infinite Love is, we Are. A non-contingent Source which is lovingly restorative and Infinitely expanding potential and able to give its potentiality away in one direction infinitely. As counterintuitive as it sounds or is perceived, Infinite Loving Being (energy) gives infinitely so that it can give infinitely of its potentiality. Infinite energy gives to receive from its very own Infinite energy much like a self-perpetual explosion cannot be contained because of timeless and spacial expansion. Energy changes forms but doesn’t change energy as with an ice cube melting into the substance we call water. The variable of temperature causes the form to change but not the amount of the substance irrespective of which form the variable alters the substance. If infinite energy did explode, its energy wouldn’t cease but merely expand infinitely. This is the notion of the sun as both fission and fusion as it is splitting into two or more parts and joining two or more parts to create a single entity. From a linguistic perspective (if words could provide infinite perspective), an example might be: If more is less, than everything is nothing. OR: If less is more, than nothing is everything. The irony is the oxymoron. That which needs nothing to exist, exists absent explicable energy so as to sustain all existence. What never came into being is— and thus this being is generatively creating all beings — and will not cease being. Infinite love was never born and will never die.
"For I perceive that everything infinite love creates is both part and whole within this same inexplicable energy and is infinite as nothing can be added to being nor taken away from being.” (Ecclesiastes 3:14)
Human life be-came from infinite love’s being to return infinitely to be infinitely restored. Infinite punishment wouldn't deter evil and thus the true evil would be any notion of infinite justice. Infinite justice is reportedly the reason Lucifer was infinitely banished from infinite love but herein is the insoluble fly in the ointment. If Christ created Lucifer and then became powerless to redeem and restore Lucifer's once gradual desire to be a possessively divisional evil infinite love, why would Christ eternally banish Lucifer into hell (which would appear to be an ever expanding and timeless geographical location)? The great shepherd leaves the 99 to retrieve the one lost sheep. Had the great shepherd banished this one wayward sheep for the purposes of deterring this one straying sheep from ever again unwittingly separating from the fold, then this wouldn't have been a lesson learnt by the sheep. It would have been Christ's diabolical choice to do nothing less on earth than what had already transpired in heaven. One begotten is all begotten. One lost is all lost. But after Jesus truly understood, as told him by Peter, that he would be the first humanly divine man to receive the title of Christ out of billions who would who come to also see through hateful insecurities after cosmologically conscious enlightenment, this new realization rules out Infinite Love having ever submitted to Lucifer's evil. Christ told Peter that whatsoever he bound on earth would be bound in heaven. And whosoever Peter would loose on earth would be loosed in heaven. Whether bound or loosed, Infinite Love will restore and redeem all to grace and truth within infinite love's presence. Christ was clearly bright enough to anticipate our provisionally confusing identity crisis in preparing an infinitely loving location for transformation rather than the goofy ephemeral idea of some parochial deterrence procedure.
"All that is created came from, by, for, from and through Christ. By Christ all things hold and are held together." (Colossians 1:15-17)
For example, a cup that runneth over cannot be an over-abundance of potentiality because infinity is timeless and spacial expansion and thus, there is no such thing as an overage. The realization of one’s thinking too much is not to conclude thought can be excessive but to allow the realization that thinking leads to realizations — to include uselessly circular thoughts that realize such circular thoughts as occlusive to realizations.
The threatened mind is the egoistic mind. What is a threatened mind? It is an obstructed mind full of culturally parroted programming whereby images stuck in the thought patterns seek immediate outcomes as a means of self-preservation and ego gratification. It is a restless, repetitive, argumentative, antagonistic, comparing, contrasting, labeling, excluding and easily wounded mind. A mind tortured by the recollection of one’s rejected emotions with utterly no infinitely fluid means to justify why this mind is upset emotionally over it an inseparably unitive consciousness that creates the mind as a provisional receiver of reality. You might be wondering how the brain which consists of roughly 60 percent fat, weighing in at some six pounds— could be damaged or wounded. Well, it’s part of the mystery and now even part of common sense. Does the 60 percent fat laden brain become emotionally unglued when its intelligence is insulted? You are much more valuable than the cerebral cortex that you imagine as some anatomical organ which, if reduced to this would make you an operational mass of machinery. When you recall an instance of being slighted, what part of the personally historical imagery and conceptualization that you have - perhaps - unconsciously accepted as the lump sum of you continues to recall it? Are you living life or is life living you? What is offended? You or the programmed idea of you and moreover, did you program it or were you a haplessly conditioned caricature created by accepting beliefs and opinions without your conscious consent?
The mind is a judging machine and thus, it is a good servant but a horrid master. But what threatens the mind the most, why does one become self-conscious and self-absorbed and fearfully self-protective? Whether a religious, an atheist or a corn dog — all label guns aside— what is at the root of the threatened mental illusion that creates this horridly time warping threat? Well, this self-identifying misinterpretation involves our quick fix self-images as loosely attached to roles, titles, rank, position, status, age, race, heritage, blood color, education, social insecurity number and so on. So, the number needs to graduate up from the oppositional binary 2 until its interior perception consists of the ternary number 3. Some term this a third-eye. Imagine two opposing sides of a coin incapable of infinite opposition due to both being all part of the singular coin or whole. Two sides to every story but it’s still one story.
Infinite love has infinity to restore ALL life without our petty denominational addendums and confusingly conceptual conditions rather than reject the ALL of humanity that knew nothing but conditional love replete with a tyrannical compliance. Such a truth demands compliance by terror, not love as initiated by an infinitely, unconditionally loving Creator. The only condition infinite love demands is there never be one. Otherwise it isn’t love and certainly isn’t eternal. Infinite Love isn’t contingent upon our finite confusions and conclusions. It is glaringly clear that an infinite Love capable of impatiently coming to an infinite conclusion would not be remotely loving — much less infinite. If God is infinite being by which we have our being within this love’s Being, everything is begotten because everything belongs. Infinite Love losing patience is an impossibility inasmuch as Infinite Love doesn’t possess patience but rather IS patience. If infinite love is impatient, what might be the subjects or rather objects of this infinite love that He didn’t create to his specifications. But surely infinite Love isn’t to blame, finitely speaking. After all, how else could theologians justify the inerrancy of men, pardon me, the inerrancy of the Bible and God’s command to be an accomplice regarding the Canaanites? Quick question and I hope you don’t mind. How does a god who says “Thou shalt not kill,” get away with placing a hit job on a label called the Canaanites? Before you answer, ask Hitler, not that he’ll be of much use because, well, it’s after the fact. But I seriously doubt that any one of us would say Hitler’s motivation for the holocaust was stirred by kindness and benevolence but by Blood purity. In short, dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries or other opinions.
Ever come upon a car accident before the fact of the accident? Or have you ever held and belief about a theory you were taught in college that you hold to this day only to find out that it wasn’t a fact but a theory you believed? Maybe you still believe it and if so, why believe an opinion inasmuch as a belief by definition is, yes, just an opinion. Look it up. Let’s say god did kill the Canaanites. What motivation would make him kill the Canaanites and circumvent his own commandment? Infinite love — if God is infinite love outside the Bible — and not merely the men who were finitely furious who in penning such a immediate gratification justification inside the Bible after the murderous deed wouldn’t be thinking on all fours because finite vengeance doesn’t. And this begs another question. Why is infinite love bound inside a bible? That question is ludicrous. But for kicks and grins, could it be because we trust the men who wrote the Bible in their respective cultures and mental conditionings more so than we have ever trusted our own inner authority and intuitively spiritual witness as experienced outside of the Bible? Why did the god inside the Bible become emotionally unglued?
It seems that we started with this biblical God as a theological experiment rather than an infinitely loving and all-inclusive mystery! Oh why did we turn it into a moral contest and tribal competition? Well, that’s what binary belief systems desire and invariably oppose. And the Spirit of Truth for reasons only the cosmic Christ consciousness available NOW to all humanity remarkably had the greatest refusal and by Christians of all of our planet’s tribal religions. The inner witness, Comforter, Helper, Holy Spirit and our inner Defense Attorney (Paraclete ) was and remains the most threatening person of the Trinity due to the 1850 Southern United States knee-jerk decision by Protestant board members. Specious and devious. Christians from the beginning in the West were not taught the meaning of the word metanoia. Sorrowfully, Christians who demanded certitude about who’s out and who’s in used (and still do use) a bible as biblical caselaw to justify condemnation. The trinity opposes no one. The crowd in Jesus’s day was never transformed because they were so preoccupied with what the crowd would think about anyone who stood up for infinite love’s refusal to be conned by words rather than reality.
Posts
